Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction (BLVR) in advanced COPD
Non-surgical BLVR uses implantable endobronchial one-way valves to treat advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and emphysema.
Interventional pulmonologists at the Penn Harron Lung Center are performing bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) for select patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and emphysema.
Since the completion of the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT), perspectives on the treatment of severe COPD have evolved dramatically in the United States. NETT compared the efficacy of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) plus medical management to medical management alone in more than 1,200 patients with severe emphysema. Both arms of the study involved pulmonary rehabilitation.
Among the important findings of NETT was that LVRS affords a substantial improvement in quality of life by comparison to optimal medical therapy in persons with predominantly upper-lobe emphysema and low baseline exercise capacity.
Despite these benefits, LVRS is limited by strict patient selection criteria, cost, and safety concerns, including postoperative stroke and persistent air leak.
A number of innovations have emerged in recent years to both increase access to effective therapy for severe COPD and improve upon the limitations of LVRS. Among these is bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR), a nonsurgical procedure available at the Penn Harron Lung Center for patients with COPD who meet certain criteria.
BLVR uses implantable endobronchial one-way valves to prevent re-inflation once air has escaped a targeted lobe. In a fully occluded lobe, this will precipitate collapse, leading to a reduction in air trapping and hyperinflation.
Endobronchial valves have been shown at 12 months following treatment to improve dyspnea, exercise tolerance, and quality of life in selected persons with advanced COPD.
Patients cannot have had prior LVRS on the target lobe, significant resting hypoxemia, or pulmonary hypertension, and must be non-smoking, among other qualifications for endobronchial valve implantation.
Case report
Mr. G, a 60-year-old man, was referred to the Interventional Pulmonology section of the Penn Harron Lung Center for consideration of non-surgical lung volume reduction using endobronchial valves for the treatment of advanced COPD due to alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Mr. G’s past medical history was otherwise unremarkable.
At his evaluation, Mr. G described progressive dyspnea over the last few years and reported that he had been confined to the first floor of his 2-story house by the need to wear supplemental oxygen. Having previously completed pulmonary rehabilitation, he was now on maximal medical therapy, and was concerned about the risks of surgical lung volume reduction.
His prior breathing tests demonstrated severe COPD with an FEV1 of 0.82L (23 percent of predicted), severe hyperinflation (TLC of 9.14L, 126 percent of predicted) and severe air trapping (RV 5.71L, 224 percent of predicted). On a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) he was able to walk 276 meters (~300 ft).
Further, his CT scan showed severe emphysema in the right upper and right middle lobes with an intact major fissure suggesting the absence of collateral ventilation. This information suggested that he would likely benefit from endobronchial valves to treat his COPD.
At bronchoscopy, a direct measure confirmed the absence of collateral ventilation to the right middle lobe and right upper lobe (Figure 1A).
A total of seven endobronchial valves were then deployed in these targeted lobes. CT scans following his procedure demonstrated substantial reduction of right lung volume and return of the diaphragm to a more natural shape (Figure 1B).
Mr. G was monitored for complications over four days in the hospital and recovered well. At his first follow-up visit one month later, he noted marked improvement in his dyspnea and was now walking up and down his stairs without difficulty. Repeat spirometry noted an improvement of over 500mL to 1.4L.
On his two-month follow-up, Mr. G was no longer wearing oxygen and notably improved in mood. At his 6MWT, he was able to walk 390 meters (slightly less than a quarter mile), a 43 percent improvement over his pre-procedure performance.
Faculty Team
The Penn Harron Lung Center is among the oldest and most advanced providers of interventional pulmonology in the nation. Penn interventional pulmonologists work collaboratively with referring primary care physicians and specialists in pulmonary medicine, thoracic surgery, and transplant to design treatment plans around the patient’s individual needs.
Interventional Pulmonology
Thoracic Surgery
COPD and Emphysema
Access
- Penn Harron Lung Center
Penn Medicine University City
3737 Market Street, 10th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19104 - Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
3400 Civic Center Boulevard, West Pavilion, 1st Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Clinical consult and patient referral
For questions about evaluation for nonsurgical bronchoscopic lung volume reduction for the treatment of advanced COPD, or to schedule a time to connect with the Penn Interventional Pulmonary service, please contact Erika Viggiano, BSN, RN, OCN, at 267-319-6439.
For additional questions or alternative Pulmonary Service access, please contact Kathleen Kratz, Senior Physician Liaison, at Kathleen.Kratz@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Frequently asked questions
The best patients for this procedure are those with severe emphysema, infrequent exacerbations, and ongoing dyspnea despite optimal medical therapy.
Typical PFT parameters include spirometry showing FEV1 >15 percent but <45 percent, and lung volume by plethysmography showing TLC >100 percent and RV > 150 percent. However, PFTs by plethysmography are not required prior to referral.
To screen for eligibility, we routinely obtain an updated PFT (spirometry, lung volumes by plethysmography, and diffusion capacity), a protocolized high-resolution CT scan of the chest, a six-minute walk test, a SPECT/CT perfusion scan, ABG, and an echocardiogram. Patients can receive testing all at once or sequentially as per their wishes.
The incidence is 20 to 25 percent within the first 4 to 5 days. Chest tube placement can typically be removed after 1 to 2 days. Prolonged air leaks may occur, necessitating the removal of one or more valves.
The valves are designed to remain in place indefinitely and removing them would reverse their beneficial effects. However, if patients do not benefit from them, or if problems arise, the valves can be removed with no permanent impact.
There is a possibility that valves would need to be readjusted either because they migrate, shift or malfunction. The likelihood of valve adjustment in the post-market data is currently about 10 to 15 percent over two years.
To predict who may experience a substantial benefit, Penn Harron Lung Center specialists consider the degree of hyperinflation/air trapping, the degree of heterogeneity of lung destruction, and fissure completeness. Our patient experience parallels that seen in the clinical trials where patients with more air trapping and more heterogenous disease tend to have the best results.
From the clinical trials, using those trial criteria, patients with heterogeneous disease typically experience improvements in 6MWD of close to 100 yards with improvements in FEV1 of 100-200cc. The results in patients with homogenous disease are typically more modest.
At Penn Medicine, all patients referred for BLVR or LVRS are discussed in a multidisciplinary committee meeting to assess optimal treatment strategies for advanced care, including potential referral to transplant. This is then discussed with the patient and referring pulmonologist for a joint decision. Patients evaluated by the lung transplant team who might benefit from BLVR are also internally referred to the valve program for assessment.
Associated Resources
Listen to a podcast with Dr. Kevin Ma: Endobronchial Valve Placement for Emphysema/COPD: Breathing Easy Without Major Surgery
Related articles
Amyloid removal may curb Alzheimer's progression for years
In an Alzheimer’s disease patient’s brain, regions cleared of amyloid had little tau; nearby areas with persistent amyloid had greater signs of damage.
Novel medicine for rare disease prompts $10M gift for trials
The Clayco Foundation award will go toward safety trials of a new small molecule drug aimed at treating RVCL, a rare, fatal disease with no cure.