Penn Today Online

Related Links
Find a Specialist
Make a Referral Online or call 1-800-789-PENN
Patient Education Articles
 

 


 Penn Today Online

Current Issue
Bloodless Robotic Surgery for Gynecologic Cancers
Good Shepherd Rehabilitation Network & Penn Medicine: Partners in Post-Acute Care
Importance of Evaluation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Physician Announcements
Archive of Articles
 
Subscribe to the Newsletter
Newsletter RSS Feed RSS feed
   

Home
Penn Today Online
Referral Directory
Physician Tools
Urgent Patient Transfer
Research
Upcoming CMEs

Clinical Briefing: Distraction Osteogenesis

November/December 2008

Oral and maxillofacial surgeons at Penn were among the first to apply distraction osteogenesis to the treatment of surgical, genetic, age-related and traumatic defects of the jaws.1 Originally developed to treat patients with orthopaedic trauma or disease, distraction osteogenesis involves the use of a distraction device to gradually (1 mm per day) separate existing bone segments, creating gaps where new bone forms.

This process continues until the desired bone height or length is achieved, at which point a final consolidation, or healing, phase occurs. During this time, the immature osteoid matrix matures into bone. One advantage of distraction osteogenesis is that it precludes harvest bone grafting, a procedure with many potential complications.

At Penn, distraction osteogenesis is used to produce bone growth in a wide range of conditions including alveolar atrophy of edentulous areas requiring endosseous implant-supported dental restoration; reconstruction following segmental resection of the jaw; alveolar defects due to traumatic injury and congenital alveolar deformity.

1. Havlik RJ, Bartlett SP. J Craniofac Surg. 1994;5:305-310.

Case Study
RW was referred to Penn Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at age 13, when a lump was discovered in his left jaw. On examination, RW was noted to have a painless expansion of the left buccal cortex of the mandible and decreased light touch sensation of the left lower lip. Panorex and CT evaluation revealed a radiolucent lesion of the left mandible extending from the first premolar to the angle of the mandible. Histologic examination of an incisional biopsy of the lesion was consistent with desmoplastic fibroma. Rather than surgical management of the lesion, RW and his family opted for a course of chemotherapy at this time.

When the lesion began to enlarge a year later despite this treatment, RW had a mandibular resection with free fibular bone graft reconstruction (Fig 1), a treatment judged successful. A year later, the neomandible was evaluated for possible dental rehabilitation. Because RW’s ridge height would not support endosseous implants and his bone graft was poorly positioned in relation to the adjacent dentition, augmentation of the neomandible was deemed necessary. RW had distraction osteogenesis to improve his alveolar height.

Following removal of the reconstruction bone plate, the fibula graft was osteotomized to create a mobile segment at the superior aspect. Two alveolar distraction devices were then placed in parallel (Fig 2).

Five days later, RW began activating the distraction devices at a rate of 1mm per day. After the device maximum of 1.5cm was achieved (Fig 3), RW entered the three-to-four month consolidation phase, then returned for removal of the distractors. Examination at this time revealed adequate height of bone to support dental implants. Subsequently, RW underwent placement of eight dental implants (Fig 4) followed by fabrication of an implant-supported dental restoration. His appearance restored, RW has returned to school and has had no complications.

On-site cytologic analysis demonstrated lymphocytes without lung cancer in the subcarinal lymph node, but did demonstrate lung cancer in his right paratracheal lymph node. With the diagnosis of advanced regional lung cancer, the patient was not deemed a surgical candidate and was begun on concurrent definitive chemoradiotherapy. The patient has had a very good response to aggressive therapy.

Our Team of Faculty
The Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Penn is composed of a multidisciplinary team of dental/ medical specialists whose expertise encompasses non-surgical and surgical treatment of oral and maxillofacial disorders, traumatic injuries, congenital defects, oral lesions and temporomandibular joint dysfunction.

Lawrence M. Levin, DMD, MD
Chair, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Lee R. Carrasco, DDS, MD
Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Joli Chou, DMD, MD
Instructor, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Joseph W. Foote, DMD, MD
Clinical Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Helen Giannakopoulos, DDS, MD
Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Barry H. Hendler, DDS, MD
Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Peter Quinn, DMD, MD
Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Pharmacology-Clinician Educator

David C. Stanton, DMD, MD
Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Locations
Patient appointments are available at:

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
5 White
3400 Spruce Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
38th and Market Streets
235 Myrin Pavilion
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Penn Medicine at Radnor
250 King of Prussia Road
Radnor, PA 19087

To refer a patient and/or consult with a doctor, call 800-789-PENN (7366) or refer a patient online.

 


Referring Physicians: To speak with a Penn physician or refer a patient, contact PennHealth through the secure online referral form or by calling
1-800-789-PENN (7366).

   
   

 

About Penn Medicine   Contact Us   Site Map   Privacy Statement   Legal Disclaimer   Terms of Use

Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 800-789-PENN © 2010, The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania space